Aug better for an investment? vintagebetter for playability? both are the same (give or take)better for making mods? newotherwise, they are the same.
twiztedjustin Augustus_McCrae said: better for an investment? vintage better for playability? both are the same (give or take) better for making mods? new otherwise, they are the same.Exactly.
guitardude3000gt Augustus_McCrae said: better for an investment? vintage better for playability? both are the same (give or take) better for making mods? new otherwise, they are the same.Agreed. I just played a vintage mustang for the first time this weekend and It really didn't feel any different from my japanese reissue.
johnniespring Augustus_McCrae said: better for an investment? vintage better for playability? both are the same (give or take) better for making mods? new otherwise, they are the same.you missedbetter price? reissue
Aug Augustus_McCrae said: better for an investment? vintage better for playability? both are the same (give or take) better for making mods? new otherwise, they are the same.I honestly thought that was a given...
paul_ originals are better looking because they came in cooler colour schemes.the feel is down to neck wear. it's comfortable to play a well-worn guitar, it's hardly an issue on a mustang though.
