Ok, think about this for a second...
You make a post comparing a Roland Cube amp (and showed the tiny practice amp version instead of the full-size one) to all tube amps on a forum mostly composed of rock/punk players, many of whom have probably never had any need for the pristine clean sound of a full-size Roland amp?
How does that make sense?
You'll get maybe one or two jazz/clean players to go with Roland (since that's who usually plays Roland, but also since very few jazz-like artists use Jags or Mustangs), and most everyone else will pick all tube amps instead. Duh.
So, what does that accomplish, exactly?
It's a pretty goofy poll, if you ask me. You're comparing a few apples to a thousand times as many oranges. It's basically like asking, "Which is better: a Martin J12-16gt, or every electric guitar model that has ever been made?"
It literally makes no sense.
