foxyloxy gilmourish said: dsd-2 is foul bf-2 isnt crap. od-20 is just awful. why did you even put that in the list?Wrong Wrong Wrong. your just wrong. they sounds good. FACT>!
kidwaJstang gilmourish said: some sort of devi ever fuzz - who doesnt want one?Gil pick me up on the way b/c I'm w/ you 100%
gilmourish gilmourish said: dsd-2 is foul bf-2 isnt crap. od-20 is just awful. why did you even put that in the list?NAOOOO LUKE!!!!
foxyloxy gilmourish said: dsd-2 is foul bf-2 isnt crap. od-20 is just awful. why did you even put that in the list?ok, i concede about the OD-20. but i am right about everything else.
gilmourish the older bf-2 (not bf-3) sound pretty good actually.the dsd-2 is horrible. sample time is way too short to be useful and delay sounds hugely meh.and od-20, whats with you recommending crap things atm?
foxyloxy gilmourish said: the older bf-2 (not bf-3) sound pretty good actually. the dsd-2 is horrible. sample time is way too short to be useful and delay sounds hugely meh. and od-20, whats with you recommending crap things atm?ahhh... but see thats a lie. DSD-2 are awesome, sound #### cool. BF-2's and '3's suck ass.
gilmourish bf-2 is alright .somene offered me a dsd-2 in part exchange for my jackson, but it sounded awful so walked away lol
foxyloxy gilmourish said: bf-2 is alright . somene offered me a dsd-2 in part exchange for my jackson, but it sounded awful so walked away lolthe one i heard was awesome. maybe you just got a bad one.
