Jump to content

feedbackismyfriend

Members
  • Content Count

    2,331
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by feedbackismyfriend

  1. This was basically my reaction as well, but I just figured what the heck and decided to play along Also, I love how none of us have mid controls on our amps. I dunno why, just find it kinda amusing.
  2. my amp doesn't have any eq other than a bright/mellow switch and a tone control and my fuzz pedal doesn't have any form of eq either so it's not something I mess around with all that much. that being said my experience in doing that is that it doesn't really work for my style, although I have got some gnarly metal tones before with scooped mids. Still not really my thing.
  3. from what I've heard on the internet I'm a fan of both the pearly gates and 59
  4. kinda gaudy if you ask me, but whatever floats your boat
  5. coming from red that is a very high compliment, take it to heart guys
  6. Your tone needs some work, like I understand that you're going for the whole Nirvana sound, but your tone is like pretty bad. The bassier notes sound really like floppy clean (almost like you're playing a noodle) and the bends seem to sound really off, my guess is that you have the action set way the frick too low. Secondly when you kick on the DS-2 it sounds kinda bad I'd recommend finding an amp with good distortion and just using that (line 6 and boss are both in my opinion crap for the most part). Furthermore, I'd say the "Nirvana sound" is actually more of an attitude than an actual sound
  7. I vote for the second one it's cheaper, classier, more unique in today's scene, and has the trem there if you decide that you would like to use it
  8. I saw those already in a guitarplayer ad I dun remember who made them though. If I run across the ad again I'll post a link. edit: nvm I assumed your links were to guitars cuz I thought they were in response to the comment about the ibanez
  9. I've heard they're good, but not really all that similar to real airlines in most ways aside from aesthetically. So it's not really authentic, but I still wouldn't mind having one
  10. my one issue with them is that they seem to sound bright as frick in the bridge position judging by those demos, other than that they appear to be a good value
  11. I don't remember for certain which one it's supposed to be, but I think it's a regular spaced bucker. Either way though it really doesn't make a difference soundwise if the poles are slightly misaligned.
  12. ya I heard one sound demo of a stock one and it sounded pretty good stock as well
  13. did you hear that guitarfetish sells telemaster copies for pretty cheap?
  14. I think that you should prolly refrain from making an opinion until you play one as you have no idea how they play or how they sound or anything, all you know at this point (that you've let on) is that you don't like Squiers. This is only my opinion, and in actuality I am a hypocrite for giving it, because I usually dismiss Epiphones simply because they're Epiphones. Really, where I am prolly coming from is that I've played some very nice Squiers in my day and I hate seeing such [what appears to me to be] an awesome new addition to their line dismissed before it's even been tried. PS I just s
  15. that seems to me to be a weird thng to stand out as the only decent part of the guitars.......
  16. I was at Guitar Center yesterday and they didn't have any
  17. try using a power adapter instead of a battery, worked for my boss metalcore that I used to have could very well be a completely different issue
  18. very much agreed on both aspects of this post
  19. prolly my strat or my tele, both are just perfect.
×
×
  • Create New...